<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slashdot &#124; Microsoft Messenger Virus Hits Reuters IM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technoprimitive.org/wordpress/archives/2005/04/30/slashdot-microsoft-messenger-virus-hits-reuters-im/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technoprimitive.org/wordpress/archives/2005/04/30/slashdot-microsoft-messenger-virus-hits-reuters-im/</link>
	<description>Rumblings, Ramblings, and Ruminations</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.technoprimitive.org/wordpress/archives/2005/04/30/slashdot-microsoft-messenger-virus-hits-reuters-im/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 11:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technoprimitive.org/wordpress/?p=554#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I find a security breach in an IM program less-than-shocking, and in a Micro$oft Messenger-based IM program NORMAL. We routinely REMOVE Messenger COMPLETELY from the XP computers at the place where I work--if it ain't there, it ain't a vunerability, is the way we think. However, the comments about IM in general I find interesting--all the way from "essential" to "counterproductive". Again, where I work, the IM client is the only thing keeping us from moving away from one piece of software we would really like to dump. As soon as we find a good IM replacement (which, I think, will mean as soon as I teach myself to set up and administer a server for Jabber) we will dump it and improve network administration simplicity 100%. By making it 100% Microsoft, ironically enough.......life is full of these little twists....but if we don't have IM, we will be drawn and quartered by the users of our network--and I can't say that I blame them. IM fills a need that is just too great to go unfilled, at least in our organization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find a security breach in an IM program less-than-shocking, and in a Micro$oft Messenger-based IM program NORMAL. We routinely REMOVE Messenger COMPLETELY from the XP computers at the place where I work&#8211;if it ain&#8217;t there, it ain&#8217;t a vunerability, is the way we think. However, the comments about IM in general I find interesting&#8211;all the way from &#8220;essential&#8221; to &#8220;counterproductive&#8221;. Again, where I work, the IM client is the only thing keeping us from moving away from one piece of software we would really like to dump. As soon as we find a good IM replacement (which, I think, will mean as soon as I teach myself to set up and administer a server for Jabber) we will dump it and improve network administration simplicity 100%. By making it 100% Microsoft, ironically enough&#8230;&#8230;.life is full of these little twists&#8230;.but if we don&#8217;t have IM, we will be drawn and quartered by the users of our network&#8211;and I can&#8217;t say that I blame them. IM fills a need that is just too great to go unfilled, at least in our organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.340 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-01-07 20:10:02 -->
